The authors regret that the following contributors were not acknowledged in the original manuscript: Ondrej Franek (Czech Republic); Nuria López Cabeza (Spain); José M. Navalpotro Pascual (Spain). The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.SCOPUS: er.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe
In both the original publication (DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4206-2) and the first erratum (DOI 10.1007/...
In both the original publication (DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4206-2) and the first erratum (DOI 10.1007/...
In both the original publication (DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4206-2) and the first erratum (DOI 10.1007/...
The authors regret that the name of the second author appeared incorrectly in the published version ...
International audienceThe originally published article [1] unfortunately contained several mistakes,...
International audienceThe originally published article [1] unfortunately contained several mistakes,...
The authors regret that the list of the ERC 2021 Guidelines Collaborators which were included in App...
The authors regret that the list of the ERC 2021 Guidelines Collaborators which were included in App...
The authors regret that the list of the ERC 2021 Guidelines Collaborators which were included in App...
The authors regret that the list of the ERC 2021 Guidelines Collaborators which were included in App...
A mistake was made in Fig. 2: in the lower blue box on the right-hand side, poor outcome is reported...
Page 136 – there is text missing from the end of this page. The final bullet point should read: • If...
Page 136 – there is text missing from the end of this page. The final bullet point should read: • If...
Page 136 – there is text missing from the end of this page. The final bullet point should read: • If...
In both the original publication (DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4206-2) and the first erratum (DOI 10.1007/...
In both the original publication (DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4206-2) and the first erratum (DOI 10.1007/...
In both the original publication (DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4206-2) and the first erratum (DOI 10.1007/...
In both the original publication (DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4206-2) and the first erratum (DOI 10.1007/...
The authors regret that the name of the second author appeared incorrectly in the published version ...
International audienceThe originally published article [1] unfortunately contained several mistakes,...
International audienceThe originally published article [1] unfortunately contained several mistakes,...
The authors regret that the list of the ERC 2021 Guidelines Collaborators which were included in App...
The authors regret that the list of the ERC 2021 Guidelines Collaborators which were included in App...
The authors regret that the list of the ERC 2021 Guidelines Collaborators which were included in App...
The authors regret that the list of the ERC 2021 Guidelines Collaborators which were included in App...
A mistake was made in Fig. 2: in the lower blue box on the right-hand side, poor outcome is reported...
Page 136 – there is text missing from the end of this page. The final bullet point should read: • If...
Page 136 – there is text missing from the end of this page. The final bullet point should read: • If...
Page 136 – there is text missing from the end of this page. The final bullet point should read: • If...
In both the original publication (DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4206-2) and the first erratum (DOI 10.1007/...
In both the original publication (DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4206-2) and the first erratum (DOI 10.1007/...
In both the original publication (DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4206-2) and the first erratum (DOI 10.1007/...
In both the original publication (DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4206-2) and the first erratum (DOI 10.1007/...